THE INFLUENCE OF LEADERSHIP AND THE SYSTEM APPRECIATION OF WORK MOTIVATION AND PERFORMANCE
Abstract
This research aims to know and analyze the influence of leadership and the award
system to performance through work motivation. The subjectsof this research are the
employees of Technical Implementation Unit for Services Revenue East Java province all
ordinate of Probolinggo that consist of 77 people.
This research uses explanatory research. As the independent variable is leadership (X1)
and award system (X2), the intervening variableis work motivation (Y1), and the
dependent variable is performance (Y2). Analyses of the data used are validity and
reliability, the classic assumption test, the suitability of the model test and path analysis.
The result shows that the leadership has a significant effect on work motivation, reward
systems have a significant effect on work motivation, leadership does not significantly
influence the performance, reward systems have a significant effect on performance, and
work motivation has significant effect on performance.
The coefficient of determination (R2) for path model is 0.9841 or 98.41% in the form of a
percentage. It means the diversity of data that can be explained in this study is 98.41%.
The information contained in the data amounted to 98.41% can be explained by the path
model. While the rest of 1.59% are explained by other variables which arenot examined
in this study.
References
Brahmasari Ida Ayu dan Suprayetno Agus. 2008. Pengaruh Motivasi Kerja, Kepemimpinan dan Budaya Organisasi terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Karayawan serta Dampaknya pada Kinera Perusahaan (Studi kasus pada PT. Pei Hai International Wiratama Indonesia). Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan, Vo. 10, No. 2, September 2008, 124-135.
Danish, R.Q, dan Ali, Usman. 2010. Impact of Reward and Recognition on Job Satisfaction and Motivation: An Empirical Study from Pakistan. International Journal of Business and Management, Vol. 5, No. 2, February, 159-167.
Djoemadi Rokhman Farid dan Moermijati. 2014. Pengaruh Karakteritik Pimpinan dan Penghargaan terhadap Motivasi Kerja dan Kinerja Karyawan (Studi pada PT Visi Karya Agritama). Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, Volume 12, Nomor 12, Juni 2014, 239-247.
Hasibuan, Malayu S.P. 2008. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.
Istijanto. 2010. Riset Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta : PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Kusuma, Mahendra. 2012. Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Partisipatif, Kompensasi dan Motivasi terhadap Kinerja Karyawan di Sekolah Tinggi dan Politeknik Cahaya Surya Kediri. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, Revitalisasi, Vol. 1, No. 3, Desember 2012.
Luthans, F. 2005. Organizational Behavior. New York: McGraw-hill..
Mulyadi dan Setyawan. 2001. Sistem Perencanaan dan Pengendalian Management. Edisi 2. Jakarta: Penerbit Salemba Empat.
Reni. 2015. Pengaruh Kepemimpinan terhadap Motivasi Kerja Karyawan pada UD. Surya Phone di Samarinda. E-Journal Ilmu Administrasi Negara, 2015, 3 (4), 966-978.
Robbins, Stephen. 2001. Perilaku Organisasi. Jakarta: PT. Prehallindo.
Robbins, Stephen. 2007. Organizational Behaviour. New Jersey: Prestice Hall International Inc.
Royani, Sahar Junaiti dan Mustikasari. 2012. Sistem Penghargaan terhadap Kinerja Perawat Melaksanakan Asuhan Keperawatan. Jurnal Keperawatan Indonesia, Vo. 15, No. 2, Juli 2012, 129-136.
Sinollah. 2010. Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Situasional terhadap Motivasi Kerja Karyawan CV. Duta Bangsa Pasuruan. Jurnal Otonomi, Vol. 10, No. 2, Nopember 2010, 135-145.
Subhi Ryan Emil. 2014. Pengaruh Kepemimpinan Transformasional terhadap Kinerja Karyawan dengan Penghargaan sebagai Variabel Moderating. Jurnal Ilmu dan Riset Manajemen, Vo. 3, No. 2, 2014.
Tohardi, Ahmad. 2002. Pemahaman Praktis Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Cetakan I. Bandung : Penerbit CV. Mandar Maju Universitas Tanjung Pura.
Wibowo. 2012. Manajemen Kinerja. Edisi Ketiga. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
Wielligh, M H. 2006. Scientist’s Leadership Style in a Scientific Organization. Pretoria: University of South Africa (UNISA).
