Cnrt Timor Leste Party Parliamentary Candidate Recruitment System
Abstract
This study examines the process and strategies of recruiting prospective members of parliament for the CNRT Party in Timor-Leste as a key indicator in strengthening political positions through democratic internal mechanisms. Using a qualitative research approach and data collection methodology through in-depth interviews, direct observation, and document analysis, this study aims to understand the stages of the recruitment process, the factors that influence it, the main challenges faced, and the extent to which the recruitment system complies with democratic principles. The results show that although the CNRT Party's recruitment process follows structured stages, patronage practices and local culture influence the selection of candidates and the selection mechanism, resulting in obstacles to achieving full transparency and inclusiveness. Internal factors such as meritocracy mechanisms and inclusive policies contribute positively to the success of the process, but patronage practices and cultural resistance are major obstacles to the implementation of ideal democratic principles. The main challenges include the obstacles of a patronage culture, internal resistance to transparency reforms, and limitations in the administrative system and supporting infrastructure. The recruitment system that has been implemented is capable of producing legislative candidates who are relatively representative in certain aspects, but it does not yet fully meet the values of democratic openness and accountability. These findings contribute to the development of contextual recruitment models in developing countries and countries in democratic transition, while offering policy recommendations for improving the effectiveness of a more inclusive and transparent recruitment process in order to strengthen democratic legitimacy in Timor-Leste.
References
Camerlo, M., Clerici, P., & Molina, A. (2024). Poderes partidarios y reclutamiento ministerial.
Cheng, S. C., & Lai, C. L. (2019). Facilitating learning for students with special needs: a review of technology-supported special education studies. Journal of Computers in Education, 7(2), 131–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-019-00150-8
Clark, J. H. (2021). Minority Party Misery: Political Powerlessness and Electoral Disengagement.
Collignon, S. (2024). Addressing Barriers to Women’s Representation in Party Candidate Selections.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches.
Góis, P., & Marques, J. (2023). Migrant associations, other social networks of Portuguese Diaspora, and the modern political engagement of non-resident citizens. Eur. Polit. Sci.
Gulzar, S. (2021). Who enters politics and why? Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. (Palo Alto), 24(1), 253–275.
Kavasoglu, B. (2022). Autocratic ruling parties during regime transitions: Investigating the democratizing effect of strong ruling parties. Party Politics, 28(2), 377–388.
Kurz, K. R., & Ettensperger, F. (2024). Exploring the conditions for youth representation: a qualitative comparative analysis of party parliamentary groups. Eur. Polit. Sci., 23(3), 349–397.
Shoesmith, D. (2020b). Party systems and factionalism in Timor-Leste. J. Curr. Southeast Asian Aff., 39(1), 167–186.
Van Haute, E., & Ribeiro, P. (2022). Country or party? Variations in party membership around the globe.
Copyright (c) 2026 Marcos Soares Martins, Suwignyo Widagdo , Lia Rachmawati

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.