Ethics Statement

Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat (JPM) aims to ensure that best practice and ethical standards are maintained by journal editors, authors and reviewers. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat (JPM) editors and reviewers are required to assess manuscripts fairly and maintain confidentiality. Authors must ensure that research submitted to Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat (JPM) is their own original work and is not under consideration or accepted for publication elsewhere.

 

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

Editors and editorial board members/reviewers will not use unpublished information disclosed in a submitted manuscript for their own research purposes without the authors’ explicit written consent. Privileged information or ideas obtained by editors as a result of handling the manuscript will be kept confidential and not used for their personal advantage. Editors will recuse themselves from considering manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies or institutions connected to the papers. In the event that this kind of conflict arises, they will ask another member of the editorial board to handle the manuscript.

Authors too must disclose any conflicts of interest that could be considered as influencing the results or their interpretation in the manuscript. This information should be provided on submission.

 

Plagiarism

Manuscript submissions are checked with anti-plagiarism software for exact or near-exact matches in the public domain to satisfy the Editor that the submitted manuscript has not been plagiarised. However, when authors submit their manuscripts for consideration in the Journal, they declare that their work is not plagiarised. While the Editor makes reasonable efforts to determine the academic integrity of papers published in the Journal, ultimate responsibility for the originality of submitted manuscripts thus lies with the author.

Plagiarism takes place when one author deliberately uses another’s work without permission, credit, or acknowledgment. Authors must always remember that crediting the work of others (including your advisor’s or your own previous work) is paramount. Authors should always place their work in the context of the advancement of the field, and acknowledge the findings of others on which you have built your research.

 

Publication Malpractice Statement

Editors’ responsibilities

• Editors are accountable and should take responsibility for everything they publish
• Editors should make fair and unbiased decisions independent from commercial consideration and ensure a fair and appropriate peer review process
• Editors should adopt editorial policies that encourage maximum transparency and complete, honest reporting
• Editors should guard the integrity of the published record by issuing corrections and retractions when needed and pursuing suspected or alleged research and publication misconduct
• Editors should pursue reviewer and editorial misconduct.

Authors’ responsibilities

• The research being reported should have been conducted in an ethical and responsible manner and should comply with all relevant legislation
• Researchers should present their results clearly, honestly, and without fabrication, falsification or inappropriate data manipulation
• Researchers should strive to describe their methods clearly and unambiguously so that their findings can be confirmed by others
• Researchers should adhere to publication requirements that submitted work is original, is not plagiarised, and has not been published elsewhere
• Authors should take collective responsibility for submitted and published work
• The manuscript must contain nothing that is abusive, defamatory, libelous, obscene, fraudulent, or illegal.

Editors and reviewers will ensure that articles submitted to the journal are original studies which have not been submitted anywhere else. Manuscripts will be fairly and objectively reviewed; authors will receive corrections and suggestions relatively quickly depending on the availability and expertise of reviewers.