Analisis Beberapa Faktor Yang Berpengaruh Terhadap Kinerja UMKM Di Kota Surabaya
Abstract
This study discusses aspects of government policy, socio-cultural and economic aspects, aspects of the role of related institutions; Human resource aspects, financial aspects, production and operational technical aspects, and market and marketing aspects of the performance of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) in the city of Surabaya. The analysis was carried out using descriptive and inferential using multiple linear regression analysis of 100 samples of Small and Medium Enterprises that had permits in Surabaya City. Based on the results of the study it is also known that of the seven independent variables included in multiple linear regression models, six independent variables have a positive and significant influence on the performance of MSMEs, namely aspects of government policy; aspects of the role of related institutions; Human Resource Aspects; financial aspect; production and operational technical aspects; and market and marketing aspects. While one independent variable that does not have a significant influence on the performance of MSMEs is the socio-cultural and economic aspects (X2). The results of this study also show that the independent variable of human resources (X4) has a dominant influence on the variable according to MSME Performance Performance (Y)References
Acs, Z. and Audretsch, D., 1990, The Economics of Small Firms: A European Challenge, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwall, MA.
Ariawati, 2005, “Strategi Bertahan Usaha Kecil dalam Menghadapi Krisis Ekonomi (Studi Industri Kecil Konveksi di Salatiga)”, Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Vol VII No.2
Brock, W. and Evans, D., 1986, The Economics of Small Business: Their Roles and Regulations in US Economy, Holmes & Meier Publishers, Teaneck, NJ.
Crijns,H. And Ooghi, 2000, Growth Paths of Medium Sized Entrepreneurial Companies. De Vlerick School Voor Management, University of Ghent.
Demirbag, M., Tatoglu, E., Tekinkus, M. and Zaim, S., 2006, “An analysis of the relationship between TQM implementation and organizational performance: evidence from Turkish SMEs”, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, Vol. 17 No. 6, pp. 829-47.
Ghozali, Imam, 2001, Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS, Cetakan Pertama, Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang
Laceiva, 2004, Knowledge-Based Resources, Entrepreneurial Orientation, and The Performance Of small and Medium-Seze Businesses, Strategic Management Journal, 24: 1307-1314
Maupa, Haris. 2004. Faktor-Faktor yang Menentukan Pertumbuhan Usaha Kecil di Sulawesi Selatan. Disertasi Program Pascasarjana Unhas. Tidak dipublikasikan.
McCormick, D., M.N. Kinyanjui and G. Ongile., 1997, Growth and Barriers to Growth Among Nairobi,s Small and Medium Size Garment Producers. World Dev., Vol.25, No.7, pp. 1095-1110.
Mulyanto, 2008, Hubungan Antara Lingkungan Eksternal, Opientasi Strategik Dan Kinerja Perusahaan (Studi Empiris pada Industri Manufaktur Menengah-Kecil di Kota Semarang), Fakultas Ekonomi, UNDIP.
Muttaqien, 2008, Hubungan Antara Lingkungan Eksternal, Opientasi Strategik Dan Kinerja Perusahaan (Studi Empiris pada Industri Manufaktur Menengah-Kecil di Kota Semarang), Fakultas Ekonomi, UNDIP
Radhi, Suhardi, 2008, ”Dinamika Usaha Kecil dan Menengah (UKM), Analisis Konsentrasi Regional UKM di Indonesia 1999-2001”, Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan,Volume 9 No.2, Yogyakarta, UII
Undang-Undang No. 20 tahun 2008 tentang Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah, Jakarta.
Wilkinson, 2002, Small, Micro, and Medium Enterprise Development: Expanding the Option for Debt and Equity Finance. Financial Sector Workshop, National Economic Development and Labour Council (NEDLAC), Johanesburg, South Africa, Iris, April 6.
Wisardja, I Wayan. 2000. Analisis Lingkungan Industri Kerajinan Ukiran Kayu di Kabupaten Gianyar Propinsi Bali, Program Pascasarjana Universitas Brawijaya, Malang.
Zhang, Y. 2001. Learning Function and Small Business Growth, Management Accounting Journal, MCB University Press, Vol 15 No. 26, pp. 228-231
