Memahami Distribusi Spasial Pekerja Migran Berdasarkan Negara Tujuan di Kabupaten Malang
Abstract
Limited employment opportunities, wage disparities, and consumptive income patterns cause the high labor migration in Malang Regency. This study aims to analyze the spatial distribution of migrants by destination country using data from the Central Bureau of Statistics and interviews. The research method used is the Correlation Matrix of Distribution, which is about the correlation matrix of productive migrant village population. The distribution pattern of the migrant population in each sub-district of Malang Regency is carried out based on the Geographic Information System. The results show that the geographical pattern of the Sumbermanjing Sub-district is the main center for sending migrants. The preference of Taiwan is consistently the leading destination of migrants from all sub-districts. Hong Kong is a significant second choice for interest. Singapore and Malaysia follow this. The pattern shows that economic factors, social networks, and migration policies in destination countries are the main factors in determining the distribution pattern of migrant workers. This research provides insights for policymakers in designing more effective strategies to manage migrant workers and increase the productive use of migration outcomes at the local and national levels.
References
Afrindo, A. (2014). Strategi advokasi berjejaring terhadap tenaga kerja Indonesia oleh Serikat Buruh Migran Indonesia (SBMI) Malang. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Universitas Brawijaya Malang, 7(13), 1–21.
Aitken, C., & Hall, C. M. (2010). Migrant and foreign skills and their relevance to the tourism industry. Tourism Geographies, 2(1), 66–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616680050027864
Astro, M. M. (2017). Pemkab Malang siapkan dua desa migran produktif. Radio Kanjuruhan FM. Retrieved from http://www.radiokanjuruhanfm.com/berita-daerah/805-pemkab-malang-siapkan-dua-desa-migran-produktif.html
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2017). Kabupaten Malang dalam angka 2017 (Vol. 17).
Giambi, C., Del Manso, M., Dalla Zuanna, T., Riccardo, F., Bella, A., Caporali, M. G., Baka, A., Caks-Jager, N., Melillo, T., Mexia, R., Petrović, G., & Declich, S. (2018). National immunization strategies targeting migrants in six European countries. Vaccine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.01.032
Imran, H. A. (2017). Peran sampling dan distribusi data (The role of sampling and data distribution in communication research quantitative approach). Studia Komunikasi dan Media, 21, 111–126.
Jack, R. (2007). Eastern European migrant workers and the Scottish tourism industry: The economic impact (No. 84).
Janta, H., Brown, L., Lugosi, P., & Ladkin, A. (2011). Migrant relationships and tourism employment. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(4), 1322–1343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2011.03.004
Joppe, M. (2012). Migrant workers: Challenges and opportunities in addressing tourism labour shortages. Tourism Management, 33(3), 662–671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2011.07.009
Kemenakertrans. (2017). Pedoman program Desmigratif 2017.
Kemenparekraf. (2011). PP No. 50/2011-Rencana Induk Pembangunan Kepariwisataan Nasional 2010-2025.
Ladkin, A. (2011). Exploring tourism labor. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(3), 1135–1155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2011.03.010
Latifah, S. W. (2014). Strategi advokasi berjejaring terhadap tenaga kerja Indonesia oleh Serikat Buruh Migran Indonesia (SBMI) Malang. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 6(1), 1–20.
Milbourne, P., & Kitchen, L. (2014). Rural mobilities: Connecting movement and fixity in rural places. Journal of Rural Studies, 34, 326–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.01.004
Nafi, M., Supriadi, B., & Roedjinandari, N. (2018). Internal marketing impact on external service quality in Semeru Pine Forest (SPF) tourist attraction. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 20(7), 66–72.
Prayitno, G., Nugraha, A. A., Sari, N., & Balqis, P. U. Y. (2013). The impact of international migrant workers on rural labour availability (Case study: Ganjaran Village, Malang Regency). Procedia Environmental Sciences, 17, 992–998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2013.02.119
Republik Indonesia. (2009). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 10 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kepariwisataan.
Rogerson, C. M. (2014). Informal sector business tourism and pro-poor tourism: Africa’s migrant entrepreneurs. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(16), 153–161.
Supriadi, B., & Roedjinandari, N. (2017). Perencanaan dan pengembangan destinasi pariwisata. Malang: Percetakan Universitas Negeri Malang.
The World Economic Forum. (2017). The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Report 2017. Geneva: The World Economic Forum.
Copyright (c) 2022 Relasi : Jurnal Ekonomi
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62e6b/62e6b8687636f55b702ab35d2de0bcc665c72932" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.